AI Detector for Teachers in India
Check student essays, assignments and project reports for AI-generated writing, without an institutional contract. Start free, see which passages are flagged, and follow a fair process before drawing conclusions.
No login required
AI and academic integrity in Indian classrooms
Students in schools, coaching centres, colleges and universities now have easy access to AI writing tools. Many institutions have started writing their own AI-use policies, and the UGC’s 2018 academic-integrity regulations already require higher-education institutions to address plagiarism. AI-generated work is a newer problem: it is original text, so plagiarism software usually does not catch it.
Not every teacher has access to an institutional tool like Turnitin. ProofAI lets individual teachers, departments and smaller institutions check work directly, with daily limits that fit a teaching week and pricing in rupees.
A fair process for checking student work
Share the rules first
Tell students which uses of AI are allowed for each assignment and that work may be checked.
Check the submission
Paste text above or upload files to the document detector (PDF, DOCX, DOC, TXT up to 25 MB).
Read the highlighted passages
Use the full text detector to see which sentences are flagged, and compare with the student’s earlier work.
Talk to the student
Ask them to explain their argument and show drafts or notes. This is fairer and more reliable than any score.
Record and decide
Follow your institution’s procedure. Never penalise on a detector score alone.
Be careful with false positives
Most Indian students write English as a second language, and research shows AI detectors flag non-native English writing more often (Liang et al. 2023). Rote-learned answers, standard essay formats and model answers from guidebooks can also look machine-like. Treat moderate scores with caution, look at the passages rather than the number, and give students the chance to respond.
Assessment ideas that reduce AI misuse
In-class writing
Short handwritten or timed answers give a baseline of each student’s own style.
Viva and presentations
A few questions about a submitted project quickly show understanding.
Local and personal topics
Questions about local issues, class discussions or personal experience are harder to outsource.
Staged submissions
Collect outlines and drafts before the final version.
Plans for teachers and institutions
| Need | Plan | Price |
|---|---|---|
| Occasional checks | Free account | ₹0, 25 detections/day |
| A class set every week | Starter | ₹849/month or ₹8,499/year, 75/day |
| A department | Pro | ₹2,499/month or ₹24,999/year, 200/day |
| Portal or LMS integration | API | From ₹4,499/month. See the API platform |
Pay with cards or UPI. See pricing for details.
Reading results for common assignment types
| Assignment type | How reliable is detection? | Tip |
|---|---|---|
| Essays and long answers | Most reliable (continuous prose) | Check the whole essay; review red passages. |
| Project reports and dissertations | Reliable for prose sections | Ignore tables, code and references; focus on discussion chapters. |
| Lab records and practical files | Less reliable (formulaic by design) | Compare with in-lab observations rather than relying on scores. |
| Short answers (under 100 words) | Low reliability | Use for spotting patterns across a class, not for individual decisions. |
| Translated or bilingual answers | Use extra caution | Translation tools can make writing look machine-like. |
Sample AI-use statement for your course
“You may use AI tools to brainstorm ideas, check grammar and understand concepts. You may not submit text written by AI tools as your own work. If you use AI in any other way, describe how in a short note with your submission. Submissions may be checked with AI-detection software; results are reviewed by your teacher and you will always have the chance to explain your work.”
Adapt the wording to your subject and your institution’s rules, share it at the start of the term, and repeat it on each assignment brief so students cannot miss it.
Handling a suspected case: a conversation guide
Prepare privately
Note the flagged passages, compare with the student’s earlier work, and check whether your AI-use rules were clear.
Ask open questions
Invite the student to explain their argument and how they wrote the piece: “Walk me through how you developed this paragraph.”
Look at the process
Ask for notes, drafts or version history. Genuine work usually has a visible history.
Decide proportionately
If AI was misused, follow your institution’s procedure; a first case may call for a resubmission rather than a penalty.
Close the loop
Explain the decision and the rules clearly, and record the case consistently.
For schools and coaching centres
School teachers and coaching faculty mostly see short written answers, essays for language papers and practice tests. AI detection is most useful there for longer essays and take-home writing. For short answers, a quick in-class rewrite or a few spoken questions is usually more reliable than any score.
If several teachers share checking, agree on one process first: which work is checked, who reviews flagged results, and how students are told. Consistency protects both students and teachers.
Frequently Asked Questions
Use an AI detector to check submissions, review the highlighted passages, compare with the student’s earlier work and talk to the student before any decision.
Yes. ProofAI gives 25 free detections per day with a free account (10 per day without one).
Yes. Upload PDF, DOCX, DOC or TXT files up to 25 MB with the document detector.
No detector is accurate enough to be the only evidence. Use the score to decide what to review, then talk to the student and look at their drafts.
Not yet. ProofAI is currently most reliable on English text.
Yes. Departments can use Pro plans, and IT teams can integrate detection into student portals with the API.
Less reliably. Formulaic and very short texts carry little signal, so use scores there only to spot patterns, not to judge individual students.
Yes. Transparency is fairer and also discourages misuse. Include it in your course’s AI-use statement.
Heavy paraphrasing and humanizer tools can lower AI scores, which is why detection should be combined with process evidence like drafts, in-class writing and short viva questions.
Most texts and documents return a result within seconds, so you can check a class set in one sitting.
Yes. With a free or paid account, your dashboard keeps a history of your checks (scores and verdicts, not the student’s text).
Related tools and guides
Last updated: 10 October 2026
Check your class’s assignments — start free
25 free detections a day with a free account. Plans in INR when you need more.
Upload a PDF or Word file